Subscribe to RSS
"As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord." (Joshua 24:15)

All posts

Selective outrage

Many things are condemned by the social witness policies of the Presbyterian Church (USA). However, the public outrage expressed by denominational leadership is overtly selective. 


They have publicly threatened the Kentucky legislature with a statewide boycott if efforts to enforce federal laws related to illegal immigration are pursued. I find it strange that the same people who regard it as unseemly to withhold per-capita funds for reasons of conscience as a means of seeking to influence the denomination also regard it as appropriate to threaten the very state that grants the PCUSA economic exemptions for property taxes with an economic boycott. I imagine this puts our Moderator Cynthia Bolbach, who is an honorary Kentucky Colonel, in a difficult position.

 

The 2010 General Assembly took action to condemn the enforcement of federal laws by the state of Arizona to curb illegal immigration. Our denominational leaders are following through to advance that cause. However, they are not following through as vigorously on actions of the GA to condemn the defamatory use of the Lord’s name in broadcasting, nor earlier social witness policies related to child pornography or child sexual exploitation

 

No outrage has been voiced and no similar boycott threatened against Viacom, MTV and all those who advertise during their new show Skins.

 

Are we more outraged over what might happen to undocumented illegal immigrants than we are outraged over what is happening right now to our children? Does child pornography, the sexual exploitation of children and the taking of the Lord’s name in vain not raise our ire? All of these are condemned by the social witness policy of the PCUSA and yet denominational leadership, which is vociferous in its outrage over immigration, is deafeningly silent about the broadcasting of child sex acts.

 

MTV’s new graphic teen sex show, Skins, features sexual promiscuity, illicit drug use and rampant profanity. Three million people watched the first episode target marketed over the past several months to our children. The actors are also teens as young as 15. The script calls for them to engage in frequent sex acts with a variety of partners. The legal description of that is “child pornography.”

 

I find it strange that the same people who are outraged over the societal forces that perpetuate generational poverty

 

 

 

are not equally outraged over legalized gambling. Why are we as a denomination not boycotting the 43 states that have a lottery, which is the most common form of legal gambling and widely acknowledged to prey on the poor? So, Presbyterians would be left to meet in Alabama, Alaska, Hawaii, Mississippi, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. Remove from that list the states that allow other forms of gambling and we’re left only with Utah and Hawaii.

 

 

 

 

 

  

While we’re boycotting states based on our moral outrage, let us not neglect the issues of capital punishment and abortion. I find it strange that the same people who are offended by capital punishment are not equally outraged by the murder of innocent millions through abortion. Our social witness policy recognizes abortion as a grave moral sin, so why are we not boycotting every state where it is legal? (By the way, the death penalty is legal in Pennsylvania – the site of the PCUSA’s 2012 General Assembly. That state, along with Colorado, Florida, Kansas, Indiana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia, also is considering immigration laws similar to the one proposed in Kentucky.)

 

Where does that leave us? Of the states where gambling, prostitution and the death penalty are not legal, and state lawmakers aren’t threatening to enforce existing federal immigration laws, we’re left only with Hawaii.

 

Better beef up those travel budgets and let the Presbytery of the Pacific know we’re coming.

 

Selective outrage on social issues is not a very compelling witness for Jesus Christ.  

 

Facebook DZone It! Digg It! StumbleUpon Technorati Del.icio.us NewsVine Reddit Blinklist Furl it!

Comments  12

  • Deb 21 Jan, 05:24 PM

    After the priest pedophile scandal, many people left the church. So now the churches must go after the illegals to fill the pews and most important, the money basket. The church is more interested in lining their own pockets instead of showing the moral outrage, as you wrote about. Sad that the church is supporting illegal criminals. And why is the church into political issues? What happened to the separation of church and state. Let them boycott, those never work anyway.
  • Jake 21 Jan, 06:32 PM

    Carmen,

    You made a bunch of good points.

    I wonder what would happen if the PCUSA made its overarching goal the worship and exultation of the name of Jesus Christ above every other name that is named? So often it seems as though we are putting the cart before the horse. My job on this screwy planet is to love and adore the God who graciously saved me from my sin and has given me an abundant life through His Spirit Who indwells me. That is also the job of the Church. Then out of God's grace and providence I can generously share His resources with those he has put in my path. Sure justice is important, but when we put it ahead of bearing witness to the incredible grace, kindness, and mercy of God in Jesus Christ we inevitably fall short. Christ first, then justice. Not vice versa. Put Christ first in all things, then justice will roll down like waters, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream. Right now the PCUSA is falling short and lacking the glory of God. It's a shame. Let us repent and turn to God and in His grace set our priorities right, lest He turn to us and say: "I hate, I despise your feasts, and I take no delight in your solemn assemblies. Even though you offer me your burnt offerings and grain offerings, I will not accept them; and the peace offerings of your fattened animals, I will not look upon them. Take away from me the noise of your songs; to the melody of your harps I will not listen." (Amos 5:21-23 ESV) and "Behold, I am setting a plumb line in the midst of my people Israel; I will never again pass by them; the high places of Isaac shall be made desolate, and the sanctuaries of Israel shall be laid waste, and I will rise against the house of Jeroboam with the sword." (Amo 7:8-9 ESV) If the PCUSA and the USA continue down the path we are on, and the Lord doesn't judge us, then He is going to have to apologize to Israel.

    Jake Horner

  • Jay Pence 22 Jan, 06:22 PM

    SADLY, Carmen Fowler is correct.

    Also, never did the church at any level help me reach the two biggest decisions of my younger life: what work I would do for a living and how I would live sexually.

    I remain in PCUSA because with my wife we can work for change. AND most important we all in our local church do very much that is very right and a blessing: worship, pastoral care, social action, study, fellowship. The Holy Spirit is evident here.
  • Linda Speck 23 Jan, 03:47 AM

    Thank you for speaking out on this matter. I hope your article reaches its mark.

    To that end, you may want to fix a mistake in your second paragraph before someone tries to use it as a way of trying to discredit you: I believe you mean "reasons of conscience," rather than "reasons of conscious."

    Linda Speck
  • VirginiaGentleman 23 Jan, 04:04 AM

    It is evident we're in a race to the bottom with TEC (The Episcopal Church) to see which one of us can crack the 2M member figure.
  • Richard Conway 24 Jan, 07:38 AM

    Carmen, your remarks are right on target, it is no wonder so many of us have no respect for PCUSA leadership. Even if they appear to have a good idea or plan, it's not going to be trusted. They have lost that loving feeling.
  • carmen fowler 26 Jan, 03:37 PM

    I just wanted to say thanks to each of you for your comments. Jake, you are right on!
  • Richard Conway 27 Jan, 05:07 PM

    I agree with Jake too. The question still remains, what do we do if our church does not give God the glory first and foremost? I don't doubt that most of us believe that, but what to do about leaders taking us down the wrong path? What do we do with those in the pews who have been seduced by the evil one and view evangelicals as the troubled ones? Yes we pray for them, we pray for our brothers and sisters, but we must ACT too.
  • Jackson 27 Jan, 06:00 PM

    While the PCUSA leadership continues to arrange the deck chairs, the ship slowly slips under the waves. The time has long passed, when the church should have renewed its reason for being and again embraced the richness of Christianity, rather than losing its way and focus on matters of import. The ship is about to sink, too bad.
    We dove off and crawled onto a nearby life boat and were amazed to find our Lord at the helm, helping to bring us back to life. We are sure many more will do the same before the ship sinks.
  • Lottie B. Haswell 28 Jan, 05:54 AM

    Since when have bureaucrats in Atlanta or Louiville been "consistent"? One of them told me in 1978, "We make the rules; we change the rules!" I prefer to follow JESUS and my Yes means Yes and my No means No!
  • Bill S. 30 Jan, 03:55 PM

    Since when does our, or any other church, have the right to have an official position on illegal immigration?
    We are destroying the Church fast enough by endlessly bringing up the homosexual issue.
  • don 31 Jan, 09:54 AM

    Remember the statemment "Give to the Emperor what is his" etc. The Emperor says that immigrants may become legal by following certain procedures. That is the Emperor's right. We as a church do not make laws and a boycott of any state or city is , at best unseemly.
Post a comment!

DISCLAIMER: The Layman Online is a news and information resource. We welcome letters and commentaries from readers. Letters and commentaries are selected for publication based on their clarity and brevity, subject to editing, and also are chosen to represent a diverse set of views on as many issues as possible. These letters and commentaries are provided as an informational service and do not necessarily indicate an endorsement by The Layman Online or the Presbyterian Lay Committee.